
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
LATEST POSTS
- 1
Step by step instructions to Look at Compact disc Rates: A Thorough Aide - 2
SpaceX shatters its rocket launch record yet again — 165 orbital flights in 2025 - 3
A Pompeii site reveals the recipe for Roman concrete. It contradicts a famous architect’s writings - 4
The risk of falling space junk hitting airplanes is on the rise, experts warn - 5
When darkness shines: How dark stars could illuminate the early universe
The Secret Side of Italy: 12 Underrated Destinations Locals Don’t Want Tourists to Find
Bond Girl Ursula Andress’ $23 Million Fortune Once ‘Fraudulently Misappropriated’ Was Allegedly Found
Inside The Design-Forward Wellness Hotel Marking A New Chapter In Medellín
NASA shares first photos of Earth taken by Artemis II
Must-See Public Parks from Around the Globe
A mom's viral post is raising the question: Do kids need snacks? Dietitians have answers.
How to get rid of your Christmas tree — and the 1 thing to never, ever do with it
RFK Jr. succeeds in changing hepatitis B recommendation | The Excerpt
How to disinfect if the stomach bug hits your home













